One topic that many people think about is that of sweatshops,and whether or not they should be used when producing something. Personally, I think that there are both good and bad points to using a sweatshop. Say you owned a company that wanted to sell a pair of jeans for $45.00, but still be able to bring in a large profit. The best way, economically speaking, would be to use the workers in a sweatshop and have them manufacture the product. This would be very cost efficient in the sense that they get payed very little for what the make, which also means that you pay very little for what is made. If it only costs you 5 or 10 dollars to have a pair of jeans manufactured, then your profit will be a lot more lucrative than if you payed more to have it put together.
Of course, sweatshops are very sad places of employment, and most times have harsh working conditions. These places provide very little pay to it's workers, and there are often times only one or two breaks offered throughout the entire working day. According to coopamerica.org, a Honduran worker got paid 43 cents an hour to make clothing for Wal-Mart. These wages are incredibly low, and for many people that are forced to work under such conditions, it isn't enough to live on. Some people are working to support families of large numbers, and more often than not, children are also forced to work in the same conditions just so their families can afford food and shelter.
Sweatshops are an ever-present issue all over the world, and companies and economies are caught up in the circle. "Since multinational corporations are constantly pressuring suppliers for cost-cutting measures, workers most often find conditions getting worse instead of better"(coopamerica.org). This is very sad, but it is something the company and the buyer have to decide upon. You can either choose to pay a little bit more for clothing not mad in a sweatshop, or you can buy cheaper things that have been made by people in harsh conditions. Whether most people will admit it or not, sweatshops are good economically speaking but bad socially and humanely.